Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 17:23
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 178
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 270
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 59.3
55% 64.8 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 67.3
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 35 15 79 14 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 449
Write 336
Mixed 190
SusWrite 77.2
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 17.9
71% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 26.4
36% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
BT58SSD09S 240GB
221GB free
Firmware: 02000008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 396 422 350 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 484
Write 441
Mixed 375
SusWrite 273
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 34.1
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 188
172% 258 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 80%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
14GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 48 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 235
Write 50
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 48.3
98% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.3
701% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 9
708% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.5
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback