MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 08:47
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 81.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 473 8-Core 858 80% 665 Pts	64-Core 1,248 77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (65 fps cap detected)	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.1 Reflection 64.3 Parallax 62.7 53% 64 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 66.3 54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 190GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 477 480 483 423 277 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 486 Mixed 449 SusWrite 436 105% 466 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57 193% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 368 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 260 161 164 173 169 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 479 Mixed 403 SusWrite 233 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 55 188% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 371 278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 80GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 299 299 286 159 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 478 Mixed 406 SusWrite 268 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 59.1 200% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 113GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 95 96 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 125 Write 131 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 94.3 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 109%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 7GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 37 Write 21.2 Mixed 19 SusWrite 20.9 31% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 39%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 71GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 12.8 Write 21 Mixed 15 SusWrite 39.9 33% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 21%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 152GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 32.5 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 23.8 40% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.2% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,175x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	747x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	642x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	323x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	282x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	225x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	146x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	132x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	203x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	167x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $702

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16