Acer Veriton 6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton 6800  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer M945G
Memory1.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060523
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 04:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 48.8
29% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 39.1
8-Core 41.3
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 48.5
3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X600 Series
AMD(1002 0F02) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.62
0% 0.42 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 41 40 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 45
Write 36.3
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 39.4
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 32%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1e00, pendrive
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Read 14
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.5
7% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback