HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory13.3 GB free of 20.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 167
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 458
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 67.8
58% 69.6 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 67.4
Splatting 69.2
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 231 230 215 210 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 242
Write 232
Mixed 213
SusWrite 222
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 30.7
96% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 134%
Initio INIC-3609 120GB
35GB free
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.07% Terrible
Read 33.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 19.3
6% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
2% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
728GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 95
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 96.4
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
404GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 30 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 28
Write 27.4
Mixed 26
SusWrite 29.1
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 67%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 16GB-$18
15GB free, PID a205
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 19.8
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 15
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 54GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 18.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback