Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 98.1 2-Core 197 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 369 47% 357 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 218 221 89 219 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 197 Write 256 Mixed 310 SusWrite 199 55% 241 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 31.2 96% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 7.6 57% 135 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 240GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 137 135 132 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 134 Write 136 Mixed 38 SusWrite 136 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2133 0423 Vulcan-2133 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-2133 0423 Vulcan-2133 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.7% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	84x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	77x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	74x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $532

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16