| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS A58F2P-M4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140508 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 01 '19 at 08:01 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23.7%
Poor
|
37% 64.2 Pts
|
13% 96.3 Pts
|
6% 90.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Elitegroup(1019 9A19) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
2.29%
Terrible
|
2% 3.03 fps
|
2% 3.02 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 89 92 126 143 143 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
71% 98 MB/s
|
123% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 0cc4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 21 21 24 21 22 MB/s
|
9%
Terrible
|
22% 18.3 MB/s
|
4% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
15% 5.33 GB/s
|
13% 4.7 GB/s
|
16% 248 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A58F2P-M4 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS A58F2P-M4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples | 5x |
| A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples | 4x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples | 4x |
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $109 |