Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130628
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 04:20
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 566
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 40
Parallax 52.9
35% 45.4 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 37.3
38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 483
Mixed 372
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 60.2
211% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 232
210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
847GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 18 66 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 65.9
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 57
48% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
451GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 99 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 69.2
Write 68.3
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 101
57% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 67%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
181GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42% Average
Read 80.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 65.6
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
931GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 42.5
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42.9
54% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
19GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 89 87 100 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 89.4
111% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback