Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '19 at 03:51
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 148 2-Core 259 95% 168 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 872 81% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,644 102% 1,644 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 50.8 Reflection 52 Parallax 54 41% 52.3 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 74.9 53% 62.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 697GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 449 452 459 457 458 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 488 Mixed 329 SusWrite 453 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 40.7 152% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 281 230% 328 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB 5,027 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 463GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 817 818 821 821 819 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 128%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 146 Write 140 Mixed 91 SusWrite 146 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 98%
SRT USB 16GB 568 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.8 6.2 8.5 8.9 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 8.2 11% 9.98 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$127 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 30 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 31 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 53.5 75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	565x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16