Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 76
49% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 300
30% 247 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 40.2
21% 31.8 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35.3
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 113 65 3.5 8.7 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.6% Poor
Read 198
Write 146
Mixed 144
SusWrite 49
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 13.1
44% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 19.5
15% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
484GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 112 140 141 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 176
Write 153
Mixed 72
SusWrite 123
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
45GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 35.7
Write 32.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 46.7
27% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 2.6 2.9 3.2 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 2.9
7% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback