| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121101 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '19 at 21:27 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.7%
Very good
|
70% 119 Pts
|
48% 381 Pts
|
28% 445 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.3%
Below average
|
32% 40.1 fps
|
38% 48.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 123 108 106 95 99 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
111% 36.5 MB/s
|
101% 144 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
403GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3FE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 103 103 101 103 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
57% 78.1 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
8GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
34% 25.5 MB/s
|
208% 3.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 596 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 236x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 125x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 79x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 38x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $666 |