Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '19 at 18:18
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.7% Average
1-Core 107
2-Core 180
70% 144 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 306
42% 304 Pts
64-Core 292
20% 292 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$270
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72% Very good
Lighting 220
Reflection 201
Parallax 212
67% 211 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 214
Splatting 167
76% 176 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-3112A 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30060P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 90 78 61 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 481
Write 438
Mixed 396
SusWrite 115
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 41.4
138% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 310
244% 338 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$97
541GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 123 124 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 169
Write 191
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 123
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$14
23GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 21 24 24 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 152
Write 56
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 33.9
86% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.7
154% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$107
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback