Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 17:23
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 135
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 148
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 371C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2078 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 64.1
62% 70.3 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 69.7
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 226 217 179 198 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,374
Write 1159
Mixed 580
SusWrite 264
187% 844 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 22.5
95% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 600
512% 757 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 137%
Great: 236%
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
187GB free
Firmware: 17.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 269 271 265 110 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5 4 4 3.7 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 3.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 4.5
8% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $636
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback