Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20ASA109BM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20ASA109BM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ASA109BM
Memory2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150910
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateOct 06 '16 at 07:34
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 230
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 501E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 6.25
3% 5.6 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.83
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62% Good
Read 459
Write 189
Mixed 266
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 16.7
83% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 57.1
74% 130 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62%
Great: 85%
ASMT 2105 16GB
15GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.6% Very good
Read 221
Write 58.5
Mixed 74.1
120% 118 MB/s
4K Read 9.67
4K Write 9.28
4K Mixed 4.22
495% 7.72 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 9.34
DQ Mixed 4.08
499% 8.32 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 0467 RMT1970ED48E8W1066 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback