Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Memory 92.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 217 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 422 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 332 384 367 389 392 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 391 Write 360 Mixed 286 SusWrite 369 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 18.9 122% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 128 112% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 111%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 141 134 144 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 134 Write 122 Mixed 93.7 SusWrite 140 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 7.7 11 11 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	6.65% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 5 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 11 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.65% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,092 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	322x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	258x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	326x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	200x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	175x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	91x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	53x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16