Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Panasonic CF-S9LWE8DS (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CFS9-3
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101026
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '19 at 02:40
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Memory 52.3 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 44.9 28% 41 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 132 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 32.2 2% 32.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(10F7 8338) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.81 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.68 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 252 240 241 259 243 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 25GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.9% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 17 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 14.5 13% 17 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.9% Great: 106%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 3GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.71% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 1.6 3% 2.12 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.71% Great: 12%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 2.3 2.3 0.9 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 4.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 2.5 10% 8.85 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.9 146% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 48GB 2,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 800, 800, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 40960 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 7.3 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16