Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 350V5(C\|X) 350V4(C\|X) 351V5(C\|X) 351V4(C\|X) 3540V(C\|X) (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350V5C-S03HU
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120824
Uptime	9.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '19 at 15:52
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 85.5 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 136 60% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 180 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.04 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.65 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 298 300 299 305 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 379 Write 309 Mixed 257 SusWrite 301 70% 311 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 26.1 88% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 242 205% 300 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 129%
SMI USB DISK 129GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 106GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 0.3 1.7 9 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 30 Write 18.5 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 4.4 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 3.4 263% 4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 40%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 13GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 10 9.8 9.1 8.4 7.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 13.5 Mixed 15 SusWrite 9 20% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.5 97% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 31%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 25GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 9.7 9.3 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.37% Terrible	Read 29 Write 15.7 Mixed 18 SusWrite 10.1 22% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 52% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 38%
Mass Storage Device 32GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 28GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 11 11 9.1 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 6 Mixed 8 SusWrite 10.3 13% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 6GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	118x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	69x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	51x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	314x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	8x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	39x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	27x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16