HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 24 '19 at 07:49
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3930-$28
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 183
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 162
24% 173 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 47 33 49 36 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 89
Write 53
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 48.7
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 9
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slimline Desktop PC 270-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $186
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback