Toshiba SATELLITE P70-A

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE P70-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141204
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '19 at 23:17
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 189 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 100 32% 206 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 FA79) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 6.19 3% 6.3 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.78 5% 6.29 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 228 241 235 230 230 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 464 Mixed 364 SusWrite 252 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 41.4 136% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 346 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 124%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 584GB free Firmware: 0604 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 86 86 86 88 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 132 Write 62.7 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 85.3 58% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 97%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 110GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 20 24 24 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 21.7 Write 8.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 22.6 25% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 42%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 257GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 36.7 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 33.6 44% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 41%
SONY IC RECORDER 2GB 2GB free, PID 06e5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.24% Terrible	Read 1.3 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.85 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 21% 0.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,045 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.5% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 15.3 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE P70-A Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE P70-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	84x
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	59x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	16x
GeForce GT 745MNvidiaBench 7%, 1,328 samples	10x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	12x
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 473 samples	11x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16