Asrock AB350M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20190423
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '19 at 19:11
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 189 57% 103 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 328 41% 311 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Asus(1043 04B0) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38% Below average	Lighting 43.9 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 60.4 36% 56.1 fps	MRender 61.5 Gravity 43.9 Splatting 51.2 42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 927 608 303 301 303 304 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 1,345 Write 1,150 Mixed 446 SusWrite 458 189% 850 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 33.2 120% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 530 405% 548 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 236%
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 77GB free Firmware: P0801C SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 45 37 49 46 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 330 Write 212 Mixed 244 SusWrite 52.5 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 24.7 85% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 48.8 57% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M-HDV Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	81x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	43x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	40x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	33x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $201

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16