Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 06:50
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 721
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 84.8
0% 51.5 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 81.2
57% 68.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 13 8.9 6.4 15 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 61.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 15.6
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
84GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 101 79 81 68 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 82.4
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
24GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 42
Mixed 29
SusWrite 43.3
28% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 44%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
328GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 76 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 83
Write 74.3
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 76.1
53% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
351GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 120 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 169
Write 143
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 115
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.6
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 22.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback