Acer Gardeniaû¶H

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Gardeniaû¶H (all builds)
Motherboard	BR Freed_BRS
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '19 at 20:11
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	48%
CPU Throttled	73%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 40 2-Core 74.5 38% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 129 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Acer(1025 1213) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 4.88 3% 4.14 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 4 Splatting 3.17 3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 240 246 246 250 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 377 Write 250 Mixed 195 SusWrite 244 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 21.9 90% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 167 134% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 83%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 869GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 107 113 113 114 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 96.8 Write 109 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 112 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.2% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16