Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 01:43
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-8350K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
88% 187 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 483
64% 472 Pts
64-Core 491
33% 491 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 25.8
6% 27 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 38.4
7% 28.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 750GB
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2206 1988 907 906 909 906 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 3,351
Write 2,374
Mixed 1,049
SusWrite 1,304
448% 2,019 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 81.3
289% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 1,078
DQ Mixed 1,225
918% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 357%
Great: 366%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
359GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 319 314 314 311 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 385
Write 320
Mixed 236
SusWrite 314
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 12.4
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 71.4
76% 124 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 79%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
144GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,701
Write 1,469
Mixed 582
276% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 62.9
241% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 1,265
DQ Mixed 709
675% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 235%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$100
677GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 87 85 86 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 127
Write 91.5
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 85.7
71% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$46
25GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 94 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 65.9
Mixed 104
SusWrite 94.3
146% 127 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 8.2
698% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 10.4
831% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$92
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 31
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 119%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 9,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $928
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback