Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.73% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-8350K-$174
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 228
74% 162 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 491
66% 484 Pts
64-Core 494
33% 494 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
7.73% Terrible
Lighting 24
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 25.7
8% 27 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 21
Splatting 38.5
8% 19.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.73%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 750GB
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2073 2043 904 903 905 897 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 3,341
Write 2,346
Mixed 949
SusWrite 1,288
439% 1,981 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 79.3
285% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 1,115
852% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 352%
Great: 367%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
359GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 318 314 321 313 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 389
Write 314
Mixed 242
SusWrite 317
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 13.7
66% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 69.5
75% 124 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 77%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$70
677GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 147 146 145 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 134
Write 103
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 146
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$106
87GB free
Firmware: 9125
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 142 145 136 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 157
Mixed 118
SusWrite 139
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$48
25GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 94 93 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 66.9
Mixed 104
SusWrite 94.3
146% 127 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.2
696% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 10.5
835% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$105
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 31.8
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 7,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $230Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback