Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '19 at 20:26
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 102 48% 76.1 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 288 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 291 18% 291 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1587) 1.5GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1012 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Lighting 29.5 Reflection 44.5 Parallax 36.4 24% 36.8 fps	MRender 44.6 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 33.3 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 41 40 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 315 Write 49.4 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 40.7 26% 122 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 20.4 83% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 78.6 DQ Mixed 50.1 66% 125 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 168GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 88 87 89 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 81.1 Write 43 Mixed 46 SusWrite 85.5 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 455GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 66 66 66 67 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 87.5 Write 53.8 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 65.6 48% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 13 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16