Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '19 at 16:33
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 101% 185 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,191 104% 886 Pts	64-Core 1,624 100% 1,624 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.6% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 104 Parallax 105 91% 107 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 101 Splatting 76.8 82% 104 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 352GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 285 288 288 288 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 288 Mixed 273 SusWrite 282 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 39.4 163% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 235 201% 296 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%
Kingmax Pop Series USB 3.0 32GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 30GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 86.8 Write 23.5 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 22.3 40% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 32% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4 2x8GB 669 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 24.8 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 29.5 88% 30.7 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $299

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,614x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,473x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,143x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	682x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	577x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	481x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	585x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	382x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	245x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16