Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '16 at 17:04
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 112
55% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 334
35% 279 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 69.2
47% 61.1 fps
MRender 53.6
Gravity 48.4
Splatting 70.4
48% 57.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 473
Write 358
Mixed 388
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 31.9
115% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 18.9
52% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 135
Mixed 126
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.29
112% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
546GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 148
Write 115
Mixed 116
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.47
138% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
216GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46% Average
Read 88.7
Write 71.3
Mixed 83.4
61% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.38
102% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
76GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 78.4
Write 70.9
Mixed 78.3
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.32
85% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.1% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 13
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 10
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback