Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 158%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive333% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 14:41
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-8350K-$169
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 187 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 473
66% 478 Pts
64-Core 495
33% 495 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6861
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 25.8
6% 26.7 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 38.5
7% 29.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPED1D28 280GB
261GB free
Firmware: 0325 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1832 1827 1834 1822 1665 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 2,217
Write 1,822
Mixed 1956
SusWrite 1,797
438% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 225
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 204
707% 209 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 1,200
903% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 471%
Great: 676%
Jmicron Generic 512GB
359GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 323 324 324 324 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 375
Write 320
Mixed 240
SusWrite 323
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 12.5
66% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 71.3
75% 123 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 78%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2639 623 604 602 602 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 3,345
Write 2,633
Mixed 1652
SusWrite 945
476% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 73.6
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 90.7
318% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1,034
758% 992 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 333%
Great: 323%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
688GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 86 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 130
Write 95
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 85.1
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$46
27GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 93 94 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 62.7
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 92.9
129% 116 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.1
690% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 10.5
835% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$87
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 32.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 122%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 8,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $947
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback