Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 700G7C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121112
Uptime	21.1 Days
Run Date	May 26 '19 at 22:42
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 167 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 425 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M 994 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 15.3 0% 11 fps	MRender 19.9 Gravity 15.4 Splatting 15.2 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 4.66% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: JF4OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 67 71 68 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 86.5 Write 85.3 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 70.8 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 68%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77 8,773 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 315GB free Firmware: JF4OA0D0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 102 101 105 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 79.7 Mixed 29 SusWrite 103 57% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.86% Terrible	Read 29 Write 13.5 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 14 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.9 97% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.86% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.8 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	37x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	37x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 675MNvidiaBench 12%, 994 samples	69x
Radeon HD 7800MAMDBench 9%, 500 samples	6x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	5x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	5x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 4x4GBAdataBench 54%, 166 samples	19x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 981 samples	14x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 118 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16