Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 21:24
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 79.2
37% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 143
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 97.2
6% 97.2 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 31
Parallax 42.5
37% 39.6 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 74 29 117 29 19 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 146
Write 94.8
Mixed 127
SusWrite 70.4
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 8.3
46% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 104
100% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
174GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 41.8
Write 68.3
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 78.3
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 71%
WDC WD3200BEVT-2 320GB
3GB free, PID 1068
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 48.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 38.9
58% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMP4GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 14GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback