PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
Memory | 2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081126 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '19 at 23:21 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | CYP-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
46.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 138 112 134 153 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST160LM000 HM161GI 160GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 77 77 76 76 76 MB/s
|
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
15GB free, PID 5583, CruzerFit 128GB USB 3.0
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 10 10 10 9.5 9.1 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1130 1TB
13GB free, PID 1130
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8
2GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
186GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 75x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |