Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 16 '19 at 09:41
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1820-$56 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 89.3 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 156 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 155 21% 157 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% POV(1ACC 612A) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.88 2% 2.36 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.91 2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB 3,562 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1107A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 40 42 42 44 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 450 Write 359 Mixed 140 SusWrite 63.8 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 4.7 56% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 11.4 31% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 93%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 88GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 64 65 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 29.5 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 64.1 37% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 42%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 14GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 18 9.2 9.3 9 9.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 102 Write 16 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 13.6 41% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.4 223% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F6451U67F9333G 1x4GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	300x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16