ECS A785GM-M

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	ECS A785GM-M (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 50.3 2-Core 100 52% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 2120) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.62% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.92 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.35 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.62% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 97 96 96 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.3% Above average	Read 225 Write 137 Mixed 164 SusWrite 95.2 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 26.6 106% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 88.7 75% 110 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 87%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 126GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 97 96 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 119 Write 111 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 95.3 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 58%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 59GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 9.3 11 12 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.59% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 22.4 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 12.6 27% 20 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 60% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 38%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 59GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.43% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 10.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 15.3 23% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 45% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ0 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ0 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ0 F3-12800CL9-2GBNQ0 8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A785GM-M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A785GM-M

CPU
Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples	1x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-559.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 480 samples	1x
99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5471-028.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 45%, 16 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $261

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16