Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 22:16
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 140
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 391
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 7.34
6% 26.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 14.7
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 525 532 528 526 522 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1055
Write 1,857
Mixed 1040
SusWrite 569
256% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 57.2
186% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 745
558% 745 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 168%
Great: 296%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
153GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 135 58 150 167 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 384
Write 238
Mixed 83
SusWrite 143
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 13.8
51% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 66.9
48% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 78%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
9GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.9 10 11 10 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 6.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 9
16% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 18.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback