Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 506
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Lighting 48.6
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 65.7
40% 48.9 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 47.3
Splatting 40
33% 39.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 134 133 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 176
Mixed 26
SusWrite 132
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.9
324% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 1TB
5GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 20 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29
Write 23.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 20.5
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.5 8.1 7.8 8.2 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 18.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 8.4
23% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
64% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 51264Y133I 0702 51264Y133I Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 029E CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 20GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $563
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback