Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 8,673 User benchmarks, average bench 35% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 28 2-Core 48.6 33% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 40.1 8-Core 48.8 6% 44.4 Pts	64-Core 50.4 3% 50.4 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3263GSX 320GB-$68 2,359 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG020A SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 43 34 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 61 Write 59.5 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 41.5 34% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 38%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1TB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 132GB free Firmware: 0836 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 17 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 14.9 6% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 23GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 9.8 9.4 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 13.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 9.8 19% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.4 105% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16