Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171219
Uptime56.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 15:32
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4930K-$466
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
65% Good
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 174
62% 132 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 583
61% 476 Pts
64-Core 743
50% 743 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 262
Reflection 226
Parallax 244
67% 244 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 230
Splatting 157
60% 185 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$300
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 241 235 240 242 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.7% Very good
Read 250
Write 233
Mixed 228
SusWrite 239
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 36.8
119% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 155
128% 183 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 117%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 138 139 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 116
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 139
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$14
19GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 13.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 16.2
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9905403-829.A 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 35.6
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 691 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $73
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback