Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 04:38
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 164
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 336
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 6G SSD 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 135 109 107 108 122 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 160
Write 87.6
Mixed 113
SusWrite 115
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 13.9
73% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 37.6
34% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 1.1 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Read 0.2
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 1.3
0% 0.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
413GB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 100 122 68 66 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 68.8
Write 51.4
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 82.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.3
141% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: SC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 110 144 79 70 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 68.3
Write 72.2
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 95
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
162% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
702GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 8.4 7.7 5.2 3.9 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.04% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 16.1
Mixed 17.1
SusWrite 6.2
11% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.04%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
965GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.4 8.7 4.7 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 25.9
Write 9.3
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 6.1
13% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 67%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
2TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 25 14 13 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 21.4
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 16.8
20% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 19%
Seagate GoFlexSatellite 500GB
277GB free, PID 6338
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.2 8.1 4 4.2 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Read 13.3
Write 20.7
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 5.7
20% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 31%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 78 98 48 49 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 78.6
Write 83.9
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 64.8
88% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%
Maxtor OneTouch 1TB
931GB free, PID 7300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 7.2 8.3 4.6 4.5 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.32% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 19
Mixed 20
SusWrite 6
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.32%
Great: 21%
WD My Passport 082A 1TB
931GB free, PID 082a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 0.7 1 1.8 1.3 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 15
Mixed 20
SusWrite 1.5
17% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback