Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 05 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.7% Poor
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 114
41% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 309
29% 234 Pts
64-Core 333
22% 333 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.57
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 23.7
6% 24.2 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 24.8
8% 24.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 81 49 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 419
Write 364
Mixed 304
SusWrite 89
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 28.1
96% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 123
104% 155 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 117%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
167GB free
Firmware: SD24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 76 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 11.2
Write 44
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 71
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
4GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 72.8
Write 71.5
Mixed 32.8
72% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 49%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 72
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 41.5
71% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 49%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 28
Write 21.2
Mixed 21.5
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 27%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 42 42 41 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 72.8
Write 76.7
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 41.6
74% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 49%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 82.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 46
89% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $279
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $215
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $636SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback