Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181109
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 05 '19 at 03:20
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 75.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 241 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 824 81% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,324 82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 271 262 265 260 254 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 410 Mixed 283 SusWrite 266 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 38.7 144% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 141 159% 272 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 116%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 106GB free Firmware: 010G SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 273 269 281 260 275 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 454 Write 264 Mixed 276 SusWrite 270 70% 316 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 15.4 103% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 23.4 68% 144 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 74%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free Firmware: Z22000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 326 325 327 325 325 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 346 Write 318 Mixed 231 SusWrite 325 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 77.4 4K Mixed 13.8 93% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 75.5 85% 143 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 8.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 194 190 194 194 194 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 188 Write 198 Mixed 123 SusWrite 195 239% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 95%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 104 98 102 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 182 Write 154 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 99.6 168% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 267GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 79.5 Write 76 Mixed 66 SusWrite 4.1 72% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 261GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 97 103 98 101 103 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 92.2 Write 102 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 95.3 118% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 70GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 106 Write 107 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 2.1 96% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.6% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 25.3 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 22.6 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $192Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $759

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)