Sony VGN-BX195VP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VGN-BX195VP  (all builds)
MotherboardSony Q-Project
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium M processor 1.73GHz-$29
N/A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 22.4
29% 36 Pts
4-Core 21.2
8-Core 22.1
3% 21.7 Pts
64-Core 23.2
2% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$36
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 93 38 50 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 125
Write 111
Mixed 115
SusWrite 69.9
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 18.2
78% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 22.2
24% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 84%
Patriot Memory 127GB
14GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 18 16 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 21.8
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 19.2
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
85% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.87% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.67 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback