Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X79-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160202
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '19 at 17:20
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 208 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 564 57% 460 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Lighting 32.6 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 42.8 27% 35 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 33.2 30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 393 405 406 405 407 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 422 Mixed 323 SusWrite 402 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 37.7 111% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 324 246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 645GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 235 239 239 239 241 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.6% Very good	Read 244 Write 142 Mixed 173 SusWrite 238 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 37.4 130% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 160 126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 126%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 159 160 159 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 137 Write 117 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 158 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 154GB free Firmware: 50.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 86 92 92 94 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 90.5 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 88.4 56% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 3,378 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1TB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 27.2 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 27.5 20% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 99%
ASMT 2105 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 848GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 33 Write 27.5 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 19.6 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 7.5 534% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 206%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 171 172 172 171 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 187 Write 125 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 170 181% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 72%
Generic External 2TB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1TB free, PID 1240 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 19.4 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 41.2 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 96%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

CPU
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	236x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	97x
Core i7-4960XIntel $1,189Bench 78%, 5,121 samples	66x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	30x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
Ultra II 480GBSanDisk $39Bench 86%, 62,883 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	17x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $884

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16