MSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '19 at 20:40
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 135
2-Core 269
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 509
68% 506 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.7
89% 108 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 103
Splatting 105
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 334 336 334 334 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 1,192
Mixed 595
SusWrite 413
220% 997 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 58.3
230% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 673
591% 885 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
12GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 442
Mixed 376
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.4
215% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 297 297 297 297 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 444
Mixed 376
SusWrite 312
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 62.5
213% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
30GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 209 235 236 254 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 391
Write 255
Mixed 270
SusWrite 236
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 47.4
179% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 244
192% 266 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 95%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
112GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 139 142 141 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 430
Write 183
Mixed 238
SusWrite 140
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 46.2
177% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 208
156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GB-$210
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 29.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback