Asus P5K-E

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K-E (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090619
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '19 at 10:33
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6850-$57 4,150 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 32.4 2-Core 61.9 36% 52.9 Pts	4-Core 60.6 8-Core 62.5 8% 61.5 Pts	64-Core 63.6 4% 63.6 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 v2 664 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB CLim: 778 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 19 Parallax 14.5 13% 16.6 fps	MRender 21.7 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 16.5 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 57 58 56 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.9% Very poor	Read 113 Write 83.7 Mixed 68.4 SusWrite 55.7 18% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 8.4 26% 8.57 MB/s	DQ Read 12.2 DQ Write 17.6 DQ Mixed 14 11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 102%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 116GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 70 70 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 58 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 68.3 44% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 327GB free Firmware: 12.01C01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 76.2 Write 74.4 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 54.5 48% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	55x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	17x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	15x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	10x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
256GB SSD 256GB3Bench 62%, 1,638 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	105x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16