Lenovo 2325BG2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2325BG2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325BG2
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 23:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 145
57% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 209
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-3112A 250GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30060P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 199 170 142 141 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 403
Write 368
Mixed 337
SusWrite 171
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 20.4
67% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 300
229% 309 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback