Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 21:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47% Average
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 156
54% 115 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 295
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 271
18% 271 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47%
Great: 48%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1E10) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 53.3
10% 42.7 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 26.9
10% 28.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 8%
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 33
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 29.5
8% 32 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 34.3
10% 33.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 668 275 285 309 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,057
Mixed 636
SusWrite 438
189% 851 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 45
171% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 421
313% 416 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 148%
Great: 240%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$14
20GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 12 17 14 19 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 138
Write 95.6
Mixed 101
SusWrite 27.5
113% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.4
253% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 14.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34%
Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 3,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $215
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $636SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback