PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-GAMER (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150213 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '19 at 03:35 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BD) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 48 60 64 124 83 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
364GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 173 173 175 173 174 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 5.8 9.1 9.3 9.4 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 128x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 82x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 49x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 66x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $421 |