Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory17.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime21.2 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 18:33
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 87
2-Core 163
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 264
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 100
Parallax 91.7
74% 94 fps
MRender 83.4
Gravity 84.9
Splatting 88
70% 85.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC8110E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 377
Mixed 274
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 26.1
91% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 219
198% 301 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 101%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
4GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 334
Mixed 301
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 24.6
85% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 68.8
84% 157 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 111%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GB
87GB free
Firmware: M6T3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 219 230 231 234 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.6% Good
Read 232
Write 232
Mixed 216
SusWrite 226
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 32.2
104% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
813GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 164 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 134
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 164
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 24.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback