Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 06 '19 at 14:12
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 229
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 838
77% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 28.5
29% 32.6 fps
MRender 49.4
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 38.9
34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$108
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 520 233 531 316 125 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 753
Write 563
Mixed 606
SusWrite 308
125% 558 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 31
129% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 458
361% 498 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 111%
Great: 140%
WD My Passport Essential 500GB
63GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 29 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 27.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 30
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15%
Great: 18%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6 6 6 5.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 126
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.6
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback