Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '19 at 15:05
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 130
61% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 340
34% 276 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2610) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1075 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 9.78
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 12
Splatting 15.6
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 59 40 57 33 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 8.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 45.9
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
14GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 24.9
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 24.6
36% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 52%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 9.7 12 7.7 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 21.5
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 8.6
24% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback