Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 04:08
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$46
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 312
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 5.84
6% 7.1 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.04
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 129 119 147 140 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 130
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
56GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 63 64 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 61.5
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 63.7
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GLLG42F-D8KBGG------ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback